<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PHNix TechNet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phnix.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phnix.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>PHNix Network Technology Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating the OOXML Vote by Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://phnix.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/investigating-the-ooxml-vote/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phnix.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-6</guid>
		<description>You said...



&lt;blockquote&gt;Those in the Philippines who voted to approve the OOXML non-standard should not be allowed to get away scot-free with such a disservice. It’s about time someone send a letter of protest — not just to ISO but to the Commission on ICT as well!&lt;/blockquote&gt;



-- Your protest letter to the CICT will not prosper as it was the CICT that voted twice for approval (one for NCC, one for CICT) that broke the deadlock thereby approving the "standard" and endosrsing it to ISO.. this proves just how ignorant the CICT is on ICT matters... sabagay... its not a good idea to bite the hand that feeds you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Those in the Philippines who voted to approve the OOXML non-standard should not be allowed to get away scot-free with such a disservice. It’s about time someone send a letter of protest — not just to ISO but to the Commission on ICT as well!</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8211; Your protest letter to the CICT will not prosper as it was the CICT that voted twice for approval (one for NCC, one for CICT) that broke the deadlock thereby approving the &#8220;standard&#8221; and endosrsing it to ISO.. this proves just how ignorant the CICT is on ICT matters&#8230; sabagay&#8230; its not a good idea to bite the hand that feeds you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Elections Open and Transparent by gary</title>
		<link>http://phnix.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/making-elections-open-and-transparent/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phnix.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Our gov't adapting such a thing has about as much likelihood as a snowball's chance in hell. 

Open source or closed, any system that offers transparency will be shot before it even takes off.

This is interesting to me from a techie and foss standpoint, but implementation? Forget it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our gov&#8217;t adapting such a thing has about as much likelihood as a snowball&#8217;s chance in hell. </p>
<p>Open source or closed, any system that offers transparency will be shot before it even takes off.</p>
<p>This is interesting to me from a techie and foss standpoint, but implementation? Forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Elections Open and Transparent by Isles Tech</title>
		<link>http://phnix.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/making-elections-open-and-transparent/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Isles Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phnix.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I think it is already time for us open-source advocates to organize politically.

The problem with open-source is, well, it is open. Very little chance of under-the-table deal if the COMELEC uses an open-source system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is already time for us open-source advocates to organize politically.</p>
<p>The problem with open-source is, well, it is open. Very little chance of under-the-table deal if the COMELEC uses an open-source system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
