Be Careful What You Wish For

After OOXML-Gate, a distasteful and anomalous affair wherein a proprietary and flawed format was somehow declared a “standard”, observers predicted a backlash against the standards bodies involved. It would seem that, at the very least, the credibility of the culprits would be tarnished. At worst, they could become irrelevant.

Well, Microsoft got what it wanted in the OOXML vote, but the radioactive fallout from that fiasco is still fouling the air, so to speak. As reported in Norwegian standards body implodes over OOXML controversy by Ars Technica just last week, things have been unravelling in Norway:

Standards Norway, the organization that manages technical standards for the Scandinavian country, took a serious blow last week when key members resigned in protest over procedural irregularities in the approval process for Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) format. The 23-person technical committee has lost 13 of its members.

The standardization process for Microsoft’s office format has been plagued with controversy. Critics have challenged the validity of its ISO approval and allege that procedural irregularities and outright misconduct marred the voting process in national standards bodies around the world. Norway has faced particularly close scrutiny because the country reversed its vote against approval despite strong opposition to the format by a majority of the members who participated in the technical committee.

In Sweden, where there was also controversy over the way the Swedish Standards Institute (SIS) participated in the OOXML approval process, things have taken an interesting twist: the body has now throw its support behind ODF, which is often seen as a competing format to OOXML. That’s poetic justice, after what happened in the OOXML vote. An SIS official commented on the sorry affair, as reported in SE: ODF made national standard in Sweden:

SIS CEO Lars Flink explains that in August 2007, SIS decided to abstain from voting on OOXML at ISO, after finding out some of the members in its OOXML committee had voted more than once. “Also, at the day of the vote, the SIS committee had also gotten between 25 and 27 new members, most of which were in favour of OOXML. At the time, our rules allowed such late-comers at the time. We have changed those rules.”

I wonder… will there be any such justice in the Philippines?

Switzerland Empowers Consumers

The Internet and open source software are great enablers. These two innovations allow a large number of people to do things that previously required a huge investment or could not do at all in a practical manner. They empower people.

Whereas 30 years ago publishing was an expensive proposition, now you can get your message to the world through blogging, online forums, and desktop publishing software. Today, you can run an entire office network using free software only. You can communicate freely, obtain information from diverse sources, and make informed decisions without having to leave your desk.

There are still, of course, areas where ordinary people can get shafted, sometimes without their knowing it. Too often, consumers are left at the mercy of big business. Various service and utility providers, for example, get away with rotten service, erratic connections and downtime, unexplained or hidden charges, spam, and all sorts of shenanigans. Most of the time consumers can do little about it.

Well, Switzerland is a way to fight back.

The Death of Programming

One thing I’ve noticed about programmers: they can’t kick the habit — the coding habit, that is.

That statement should expose the fact that I’m not a programmer. I may have dipped my toes in BASIC and assembly language, and I can write bash scripts, but I don’t have the patience, doggedness, and outside-the-box creativity that makes for a brilliant programmer.

There’s also one more quality that I’ve noticed in the best programmers: they just love to code.

It’s not easy to stop programmers from doing what they love to do. Poor pay can make things difficult, but this obstacle can be — and very often is — overcome. Many (very many) programmers even work for free. Lousy corporate management, while it can cause much dissatisfaction among developers, just drives them away to work for someone else. And when a programming language slips out of favor, learning a new language is a quick solution to that problem. Many (if not most) decent developers know several programming languages.

A good programmer always finds opportunities to code; usually, some form of economic compensation can be found as well.

Is there anything that can kill off programming?

Yes there is and I can name it in two words: Software Patents.

Software patents are the one sweeping legal instrument that can be used to shackle programmers — and back up that immoral imposition with legal force. It is used to restrict innovation in one of the largest software development markets in the world: the United States. To make things worse, tts advocates (and beneficiaries) are pushing other countries to adopt software patents.